« Review of Devon libraries | Main | A blog about children's books »

November 22, 2006

One third of library professionals to be made redundant

This is the headline from Hampshire county council.

Not a stirring from SYRUP- their professional body (that I've seen anyhow- that's why I gave an alert a few days ago).

However, what is more calculated is the Hampshire strategy which goes:

Book lending is falling dramatically; no one wants books in libraries; libraries have to re-invent themselves without books; information comes from the internet; we don't need librarians; we don't need book suppliers; supply chain questions don't matter, nor does the fall in spending on books; PLR is paid irrespective of loans or book buying- so authors won't notice; libraries that aren't used can eventually be closed; we can confine out former library operation to a small number of so-called "discovery centres" in large towns and save the council a lot of money and fuss.

I'm not kidding you- read the Hampshire Chronicle this week- or the Portsmouth Evening news last week. the Archbishop of all this is Yinnon Ezra who is the director of "culture" in Hampshire-- and has just been appointed to the board of the MLA- because they, too support this policy for (what used to be called) the public library service.

The trouble with all this is that it is so daft that nobody believes me. They think I'm obsessed and paranoid - like a man in a James Bond movie who says that a rich man who lives in a mountain is going to blow up the world-- it is so crazy that it cannot possibly be true. Ask the professional librarians in Hampshire. I wish we had all worked together 5 years ago - I did keep offering-- but "Never say die"

The article from the Portsmouth paper is summarised below

Headline: Library staff face axe in cutbacks
by Neil Evans and Sion Donovan

A third of librarians could be axed in Hampshire as library chiefs
battle against a huge overspend.

Hampshire County Council will ask for voluntary redundancies in the
next two weeks to help save costs.

And it is holidng back £250,000 from its £2m book fund - meaning
there
will be no new books at libraries across the county until at least
February.

Councillors have been told about 20 posts will be axed from the 60
professional librarians in Hampshire.

The move is being blamed on a drop in income from libraries' CD and DVD
rentals, which has halved from £2m five years ago to about £1m this
year. This has led to an overspend of £500,000.

Cllr Peter Chegwyn, Lib Dem spokesman for recreation and heritage,
said: 'This is just the tip of the iceberg. They are talking about
tough decisions having to be made, but it's still 20 jobs going and no
new books for months. How can you have libraries without new books? I
think this is just staggering how they've got themselves into this
position. I am gong to fight them tooth and nail on this."

The cuts won't be made before Christmas and shouldn't affect the 750 or
so library assistants who work in Hampshire's 54 libraries. HCC
wouldn't confirm the number of posts to be axed.

The council's dir. of recreation and heritage, Yinnon Ezra, said:
'we're not going to do anyting ebfore Xmas but when we make a decison
it will happen quickly but sensitively. My hope is we can do this
through volunteers who want to move on somewhere else to work. We are
approaching this from a customer's viewpint. People lthese days want
longer hours and want to do their own research on the internet. You
don't ned librarians to help people with that. We will hope customer
find no difference in the service and we might even be able to release
some resources to improve opening hours in some places.'

ends


Hampshire spends less than 6% of its library funding on books. Book loans have fallen by 41% since Yinnon Ezra and Richard Ward took over management of the service. In that time the council has spent £181m on the libraries. Visitor numbers have fallen by 11%. The Councillor responsible is Margaret Snaithe and the leader of Hampshire County Council (which is Conservative) is Ken Thornber OBE Tim

Posted by Tim Coates at November 22, 2006 7:35 PM

Comments

PLR is not paid irrespective of borrowings or purchases.. it is based on a sampling from selected libraries on a rolling basis of actual borrowings.. every year I get my PLR statement with the exact number of BORROWINGS of each title - from the selected libraries which are a good cross section of library sizesm areas and types. Where did anyone get the idea that it is based on anything else ? How could it be ?

Posted by: SUSAN HILL at November 22, 2006 9:35 PM

Susan

sorry- I misexplained myself: the total sum of money that is paid out through PLR is not dependent on the number of library loans.

in the twenty years since PLR was launched, lending of library books has fallen to below half the level it was at originally. However the funds made available by Government for giving out through PLR has increased quite substantially. That is what I meant when I said they are not connected and that authors would not be aware of the dramatic decline in overall library use from their PLR returns. tim

When PLR started book loans were about 650m per annum, now they are about 250m per annum and falling at the rate of about 14m each year. Nothing in your PLR return will draw your attention to that. Am I wrong?

Posted by: tim at November 22, 2006 9:41 PM

Don't despair, Tim. There is a real high-tech fightback beginning against those faux-tech anti-book politicos.

The internet is now being used to promote books throught the hosting of multimedia book-trailers. This is a genre that the MLA and the other anti-book bureaucrats did not expect.

Here is just one example, from a popular music website :

http://www.myspace.com/eustonworms

It is ironic that the council advocate on municipal book-burning should be himself named after a book of the Bible. Perhaps, as a non-reader responsible for "culture" he is unaware of this?

Or maybe it is, that being a "modernist", who is systematically dismantling the educational and cultural aspirations of the younger generation, his title refers to his responsibility for "gun culture".

Even prisons, which have illiteracy rates as high as 70%, still have libraries. Exactly what kind of culture does Yinnon Ezra represent?

Posted by: Ron Wilks-Becket at November 24, 2006 6:59 AM

libraries are due for an overhaul. ever visited london recently? ideas stores? have you seen how culture is being represented on all fronts? the whitechapel project? the tate modern? my point being that it has just been allowed to carry on for a longer period in hampshire because of no one being brave enough to take the reins. now the tate modern. that was a problem when it arrived. to be honest, im a hampshire resident, a young person, ive NEVER been in a library. i have no reason to when everything is so spread out. it takes me 20-30 minutes to come to winchester. if you take a look at what cultures have to be represented in hampshire, there are not really that many pockets of communities, the communities are able to cross boundaries and represent multiculturally. take andover for example. if there is any culture he represents its young people. so if your a professional librarian, working in the SERVICE sector i recommend you go and update your skills, just as waitrose would, or any other company and teach these skills to a young person. i know i dont know much, but i know a good whiner when i see one.

Posted by: Edd at December 7, 2006 7:27 PM

Not surprised to read this. Ezra and Ward ruined the Kent Library service. (I know because I worked in it.) Now they are setting about the Hampshire service too. Ezra has a chip on his shoulder about librarians. Ward is just intellectually challenged. Still, what can you expect from (1) a wide boy whose only concern is to market himself, and (2) the product of a secondary modern school. As someone from East Sussex said when Ward left there for Kent: "Your loss is our gain."

Posted by: David Mole at February 2, 2007 11:45 PM

I worked in Kent Libraries too and dont recognise Davids picture - I worked with him too and remember the support the service gave him in his hour of need.Ward and Ezra for many year tried to protect the service from Kent Councillors.Some years they lost.The Library service has to change

Posted by: John at February 9, 2007 2:36 PM

I too worked in Kent libraries.On his appointment, Mr Ezra inherited a structure not of his own choosing, after a particularly nasty review. The council's view of the library service at that time was that it was semi-detached from the County Council and was arrogant.Things needed to change.If Mr Ezra did have a chip on his shoulder it was about library assistants and other staff being referred to as "non-professionals".He felt that was demotivating.How could you describe someone as a "non" something ?

Just how do you cope with an administration in which the majority party views libraries and culture as an unnecessary luxury when grappling with issues like child abuse ? When the administration changed, one of the parties in the new coaltion viewed libraries as elitist.Both Mr Ezra and Mr Ward, amongst others, did their level best to protect the arts, libraries and museums service.

Whatever redundancies there are in Hampshire, I am sure that they will be dealt with sensitively, if my experience, and that of my colleagues in Kent was anything to go by. How many other Chief Officers would have arranged for all his staff on management grades, whose positions were under threat,to see a management consultancy firm to help sort out their future and start this process well in advance of any decisios being taken.Some colleagues in Education were told they could take voluntary redundancy, made plans on that basis and were told weeks before they were due to go "all bets were off"

The current position in Kent is much the same as Hampshire There is currently a review in progress which is reducing about 80 posts to 40. Mostly professional.Poor RSG, reductions in budgets etc. So whatever is happening in Hampshire is not the result of the vindictive machinations or career aspirations of two people.

Posted by: Alan at February 12, 2007 1:30 PM

Yinnon Ezra says "People these days want
longer hours and want to do their own research on the internet. You don't need librarians to help people with that." Er, yes you do actually. I have worked as a library assistant for years and a LOT of people need help with the computers. as well as the hardware side of things, dealing with the inevitable breakdowns etc, some people don't speak English and need a website translated for them, older people are not very confident and need help even accessing the library catalogue, children need supervision, people wanting help with their CVs and jobsearching, dealing with the booking system, printouts...need I go on? This man is evidently VERY badly informed and ignorant and has never set foot in a library, and has no idea what his staff's jobs entail. People will always need librarians to help them find the information they need, whether the information is in a book or online.

Posted by: An angry library assistant at August 9, 2007 4:55 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?